🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to ban social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and families are watching intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

European Trend

Across Europe, a rising number of countries are moving toward comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that smartphones and apps are "taking away our children's innocence". Legislation may be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the identity and age of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an similar ban could be "an tools under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has asked parliament to approve a law raising the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has suggested a related move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged families to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has passed a non-binding motion demanding a ban for under-16s without parental consent is provided. While it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these platforms, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age restriction is a solid starting point," stated the European lawmaker driving the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in conclusive data".

Earlier, momentum gathered behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was in the end watered down. Instead, the government vowed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised warnings. An organization founded by the family of a girl who died after viewing harmful online content contends that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the tech sector to create products and services that are appropriate and suitable for minors," said a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, regulation is primarily happening at the state government level due to national gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a law restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra time needing adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced measures requiring parental consent for minors to set up social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and calls from some politicians to follow the Australian example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Views

Apart from Europe and the US, other states are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies strike a more measured position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "could prove counterproductive". The body points out that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for marginalized children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

While this global discussion continues, the policies of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that states around the world are no longer willing to delay for the industry to self-regulate.